Brian L Erstad

PMID: 20978218;Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical trials of intravenous opioids for severe acute pain in the emergency department (ED) and to provide an approach for optimization of therapy. DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified through a search of Ovid/MEDLINE (1948-August 2010), PubMed (1950-August 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1991-August 2010), and Google Scholar (1900-August 2010). The search terms used were pain, opioid, and emergency department. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: The search was limited by age group to adults and by publication type to comparative studies. Studies comparing routes of administration other than intravenous or using non-opioid comparators were not included. Bibliographies of all retrieved articles were reviewed to obtain additional articles. The focus of the search was to identify original research that compared intravenous opioids used for treatment of severe acute pain for adults in the ED. DATA SYNTHESIS: At equipotent doses, randomized controlled trials have not shown clinically significant differences in analgesic response or adverse effects between opioids studied. Single opioid doses less than 0.1 mg/kg of intravenous morphine, 0.015 mg/kg of intravenous hydromorphone, or 1 μg/kg of intravenous fentanyl are likely to be inadequate for severe, acute pain and the need for additional doses should be anticipated. In none of the randomized controlled trials did patients develop respiratory depression requiring the use of naloxone. Future trials could investigate the safety and efficacy of higher doses of opioids. Implementation of nurse-initiated and patient-driven pain management protocols for opioids in the ED has shown improvements in timely provision of appropriate analgesics and has resulted in better pain reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, intravenous administration of opioids for severe acute pain in the ED appears to be inadequate. Opioid doses in the ED should be high enough to provide adequate analgesia without additional risk to the patient. EDs could implement institution-specific protocols to standardize the management of pain.

PMID: 7848020;Abstract:

Objective: To develop contemporary, comprehensive guidelines for the appropriate and efficient use of albumin, nonprotein colloid, and crystalloid solutions. Design: A systematic, literature-based, consensus exercise employing a modified Delphi method. Participants: Thirty-one medical and allied health professionals from 26 University Hospital Consortium (Oak Brook, Ill) member institutions were initially chosen to participate. Participants were selected on the basis of their recognized research in the use of albumin, nonprotein colloid, and crystalloid solutions, and/or experience in the review of appropriateness of such use. A total of 24 participants completed the exercise. Main Outcome Measures: Group responses were statistically analyzed in an iterative consensus development process. Five separate questionnaire rounds were designed to establish criteria for the appropriate use of albumin, nonprotein colloid, and crystalloid solutions. Results: Consensus guidelines were developed outlining the appropriate use of these products for 12 clinical indications, including hemorrhagic shock, nonhemorrhagic (maldistributive) shock, hepatic resection, thermal injury, cerebral ischemia, nutritional intervention, cardiac surgery, hyperbilirubinemia of the newborn, cirrhosis and paracentesis, nephrotic syndrome, organ transplantation, and plasmapheresis. Conclusions: The Delphi method, a systematic, literature-based consensus process, was shown to be useful in the development of complex clinical practice guidelines for the use of albumin, nonprotein colloid, and crystalloid solutions. It is anticipated that the guidelines will assist health care providers to develop local institutional policies and procedures for the appropriate and efficient use of albumin and albumin alternatives. Institutions reviewing and updating existing local guidelines may use the University Hospital Consortium guidelines as a model for comparison.

Abstract:

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the analgesic response to morphine in non-obese, obese and morbidly obese patients for acute pain. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care emergency department in the USA. Consecutive adults who received intravenous morphine 4 mg for pain were included. Patients were categorised into three groups based on body mass index (BMI): non-obese (18.5-29.9 kg/m ²); obese (30.0-39.9 kg/m²); and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m²). Baseline and post-dose pain scores were recorded. Pain was measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (0=no pain; 10=worst possible pain). Analgesic response was defined as the difference between the initial pain score and post-dose pain score. Results: 300 patients were included in the study (100 in each group). The median baseline pain scores were 8.5, 8 and 8.5 in the non-obese, obese and morbidly obese groups, respectively (p=0.464). The median analgesic response after morphine administration was 2, 3 and 2 in the non-obese, obese and morbidly obese groups, respectively (p=0.160). In the linear regression analysis (R²=0.006), BMI was not predictive of analgesic response (coefficient -0.020; p=0.199). Conclusions: Obesity status did not influence analgesic response to a fixed dose of morphine. This suggests that obese and morbidly obese patients do not require a higher dose of morphine for acute pain reduction compared to non-obese patients.

PMID: 19446982;Abstract:

Candidemia and delay to appropriate therapy contribute to increased morbidity and mortality. Current literature addresses the delay between blood culture collection and final identification; however, it fails to delineate differences among species. The purpose of this study was to quantify the time to yeast detection and identification relative to blood culture collection and determine whether differences exist among species. In this retrospective study, all cases of Candida isolation for 2 years were reviewed. The time delays between blood culture and detection of Candida growth were quantified as well as the additional time required for final species identification. Initiation of antifungal therapy was assessed in relation to culture collection, detection of yeast, and final identification. The appropriateness of therapy at each time point was also analyzed. Most Candida infections were caused by either Candida albicans (n = 43) or Candida glabrata (n = 27). Mean time to positive yeast detection for C. albicans was 35.3 ± 18.1 h, whereas that of C. glabrata was 80.0 ± 22.4 h (P 0.0001). Mean time to final identification for C. albicans was 85.8 ± 30.9, whereas that of C. glabrata was 154 ± 43.8 h (P 0.0001). Mean time to appropriate therapy for C. albicans isolates was 43.3 ± 27.6 h compared with 98.1 ± 38.3 h (P 0.0001) for C. glabrata isolates. The time delay between blood culture collection and yeast detection as well as final identification was significantly longer for C. glabrata isolates when compared with C. albicans. As a result, mean time to appropriate antifungal therapy was significantly longer in patients with C. glabrata isolates. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID: 22190253;Abstract:

Background: Three-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is commonly used for reversal of international normalized ratio (INR) in patients who are bleeding or require emergency surgery. However, there is little information regarding the optimal dosing strategy for achieving adequate INR reversal. Objective: To determine whether patients with higher initial INR levels are less likely to achieve adequate INR reversal after receiving 3-factor PCC. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care medical center in the US. Patients who received 3-factor PCC were grouped into 2 categories based on degree of INR reversal after PCC infusion: (1) adequate reversal (final INR ²1.5) or (2) inadequate reversal (final INR >1.5). Initial INR was compared between the 2 groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for confounders and determine predictors of adequate INR reversal. Results: Fifty patients met criteria for inclusion in the final analyses. Of these, 58% achieved adequate reversal after PCC. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or in vitamin K or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) use between the 2 groups. Median PCC dose was also similar between the adequate and inadequate reversal groups (25.2 vs 24.5 units/kg, respectively; p = 0.2). The group that did not achieve adequate reversal had a significantly higher initial INR (3.5 vs 2.5, p = 0.012) prior to PCC administration. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial INR was a significant predictor of adequate INR reversal (ie, reversal less likely as INR increases) after adjusting for PCC dose and concurrent use of vitamin K or FFP (OR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.87; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Patients with a higher initial INR are less likely to achieve adequate INR reversal after receiving 3-factor PCC and may require higher doses than were used in the study.