Katrina M Miranda

3-Nitrotyrosyl adducts in proteins have been detected in a wide range of diseases. The mechanisms by which reactive nitrogen oxide species may impede protein function through nitration were examined by using a unique model system, which exploits a critical tyrosyl residue in the fluorophoric pocket of recombinant green fluorescent protein (GFP). Exposure of purified GFP suspended in phosphate buffer to synthetic peroxynitrite in either 0.5 or 5 muM steps resulted in progressively increased 3-nitrotyrosyl immunoreactivity concomitant with disappearance of intrinsic fluorescence (IC50 approximate to 20 muM). Fluorescence from an equivalent amount of GFP expressed within intact MCF-7 tumor cells was largely resistant to this bolus treatment (IC50 > 250 muM). The more physiologically relevant conditions of either peroxynitrite infusion (1 muM/min) or de novo formation by simultaneous, equimolar generation of nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide (e.g., 3-morpholinosydnonimine; NONOates plus xanthine oxidase/hypoxanthine, menadione, or mitomycin C) were examined. Despite robust oxidation of dihydrorhodamine under each of these conditions, fluorescence decrease of both purified and intracellular GFP was not evident regardless of carbon dioxide presence, suggesting that oxidation and nitration are not necessarily coupled. Alternatively, both extra- and intracellular GFP fluorescence was exquisitely sensitive to nitration produced by heme-peroxidase/hydrogen peroxide-catalyzed oxidation of nitrite. Formation of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) during the reaction between NO and the nitroxide 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazole-1-oxyl 3-oxide indicated that NO2 can enter cells and alter peptide function through tyrosyl nitration. Taken together, these findings exemplified that heme-peroxidase-catalyzed formation of NO2 may play a pivotal role in inflammatory and chronic disease settings while calling into question the significance of nitration by peroxynitrite.

PMID: 15579020;Abstract:

Nitric oxide has emerged as one of the most important and diverse players in physiology. This small diatomic radical stunned researchers because of its existence and unique biological properties in human physiology. Over the last two decades it was found that NO often has fickle behavior in pathophysiological mechanisms. Where benefiting the host in one case yet inducing and augmenting injury in another. This has lead to confusion in is NO good or bad? Much of the answers to this dichotomy lies in the chemistry of NO and its related nitrogen oxide species. To help understand the complex chemistry with perspective to biology, a discussion on the chemical biology of NO is useful. The chemical biology defines the relevant chemical reaction of NO and nitrogen monoxide in the context of the biological conditions. We discuss in this article the chemistry of nitrogen oxide with different types of biological motifs. Reaction of NO with metal complexes and radicals require low concentration, where formation of reactive nitrogen oxide species require considerably higher amounts and generally are isolated to specific microenvironments in vivo. Though many reactive nitrogen oxide species are formed from chemical reactions with NO, there are several which appear to not require NO to be present, HNO and NO2. These two species have unique physiological effects and represent additional complexity to this biological picture. From this discussion, a picture can be formed concerning the possible chemical dynamics, which can be plausible in different biological mechanisms. © 2004 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

PMID: 21235346;PMCID: PMC3070000;Abstract:

The importance of nitric oxide in mammalian physiology has been known for nearly 30 years. Similar attention for other nitrogen oxides such as nitroxyl (HNO) has been more recent. While there has been speculation as to the biosynthesis of HNO, its pharmacological benefits have been demonstrated in several pathophysiological settings such as cardiovascular disorders, cancer, and alcoholism. The chemical biology of HNO has been identified as related to, but unique from, that of its redox congener nitric oxide. A summary of these findings as well as a discussion of possible endogenous sources of HNO is presented in this review. © 2011 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Nitric oxide (NO) synthase 2 (NOS2), a major inflammatory protein, modulates disease progression via NO in a number of pathologies, including cancer. The role of NOS2-derived NO is not only flux-dependent, which is higher in mouse vs human cells, but also varies based on spatial and temporal distribution both within tumor cells and in the tumor microenvironment. NO donors have been utilized to mimic NO flux conditions and to investigate the effects of varied NO concentrations. As a wide range of effects mediated by NO and other nitrogen oxides such as nitroxyl (HNO) have been elucidated, multiple NO- and HNO-releasing compounds have been developed as potential therapeutics, including as tumor modulators. One of the challenges is to determine differences in biomarker expression from extracellular vs intracellular generation of NO or HNO. Taking advantage of new NO and HNO releasing agents, we have characterized the gene expression profile of estrogen receptor-negative human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cells following exposure to aspirin, the NO donor DEA/NO, the HNO donor IPA/NO andtheir intracellularly-activated prodrug conjugates DEA/NO-aspirin and IPA/NO-aspirin. Comparison of the gene expression profiles demonstrated that several genes were uniquely expressed with respect to NO or HNO, such as miR-21, HSP70, cystathionine γ-lyase and IL24. These findings provide insight into targets and pathways that could be therapeutically exploited by the redox related species NO and HNO.